![]() ![]() The exchange in question occurred during a debate over diplomatic relations with Russia and allegations that the Russian government had attempted to interfere in the 2016 election. This is actually true, do you job, she just slipped #DebateNight /7qu3qPSpW7 ![]() He told in an email that “what Clinton said appears to reflect what has been said in public for years by various experts and analysts.During the third and final presidential debate on 19 October 2016, social media users began tweeting up a storm claiming Hillary Clinton “leaked” classified information by revealing details about the United States’ nuclear response protocols, specifically that the timeframe between a presidential order and a launch of nuclear weapons was four minutes: Hans Kristensen, director of the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists, was a co-author of the U.N. ![]() In a 2016 report, the Union of Concerned Scientists also said that the ICBMs “can be launched within a couple minutes of a presidential decision to do so,” and the submarine launched ballistic missiles can be launched “within 15 minutes.”Īmong the people weighing in, according to, was nuclear security expert Joe Cirincione, who issued two tweets about the controversy - one explicitly stating that Clinton did not disclose classified information and another reiterating that the information was already widely known and often cited. “About five minutes may elapse from the president’s decision until intercontinental ballistic missiles blast out of their silos, and about 15 minutes until submarine missiles shoot out of their tubes,” Bloomberg Politics wrote.į also reported on several instances of similar language used by other nuclear-arms experts.Ī 2013 report by the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research said that ICBMs are “capable of launching within five minutes” of a president’s order. In September, Bloomberg Politics consulted with Blair on an illustration of the step-by-step nuclear launch process that is similar to what the Scientific American article described nearly 20 years ago for land- and sea-based missiles. Air Force Minuteman intercontinental ballistic missile launch control officer who is now a professor at Princeton University’s Program on Science and Global Security, reports. One of the authors of that article, Bruce G. being on high alert, the authors wrote, reported. It turned out to be a false alarm, but it was the first time that the “nuclear briefcase” was activated, and it illustrated the dangers of Russia and the U.S. In 1997, three nuclear arms experts wrote an article for Scientific American that made the case “to end the practice of keeping nuclear missiles constantly ready to fire.” The article, “Taking Nuclear Weapons off Hair-Trigger Alert,” cited a 1995 incident in which Russian President Boris Yeltsin had just minutes to determine if a “mysterious rocket” fired from off the coast of Norway was a U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |